-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
-
165
-
167
-
168
-
169
-
170
-
171
-
172by Crafts, Nicholas Published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2006)“...The paper reviews theory and evidence on the ways in which regulation affects productivity outcomes. In a context of endogenous growth, it is argued that...”
-
173by Huergo, Elena Griffith, Rachel MAIRESSE, Jacques Peters, Bettina Published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2006)“...This paper compares the role innovation plays in productivity across four European countries, France, Germany, Spain, and the UK, using firm-level data from...”
-
174by Jones, Derek Charles Kalmi, Panu Kauhanen, Antti Published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2006)“...First we distinguish various approaches used by economists to assess the impact of human resource management practices on productivity and then we briefly...”
-
175by Hines, James R Published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2006)“...Increasing economic openness creates demands for social welfare programmes designed to cushion the impact of economic changes, but may also encourage...”
-
176by Sunde, Uwe Published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2006)“...Sweden is one of few countries in Europe to have introduced a comprehensive pension reform. In 1998, Sweden passed legislation that transformed its public...”
-
177“...The Scandinavian welfare states are mature in the sense of having a high level of standards for public provisions of welfare services as well as a high...”
-
178by Barr, Nicholas Published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2006)“...Many countries face increasing fiscal problems financing pensions in the face of population aging. There is controversy about the underlying economic theory,...”
-
179by Sako, Mari Published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2006)“...This paper reviews the implications of outsourcing and offshoring for the productivity of business services in the UK. Official statistics indicate that...”
-
180by Helm, Dieter Robin Published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy (2006)“...This paper provides a critique of broad aggregate proposals to reduce the regulatory burden. It argues that the public debate about regulatory reform and red...”